Highlights based on this e-bike’s specs, comparisons and practical strengths.
100
Excellent downhill control
Front and rear suspension should improve control and confidence on descents.
Front and rear suspension should improve control and confidence on descents.
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide controlled braking on descents.
The 29-inch or mullet wheel setup should help stability and control on descents.
The mountain bike design should be better suited to controlled descending.
100
Excellent off-road capability
The mountain bike design should be well suited to off-road riding.
The mountain bike design should be well suited to off-road riding.
Front and rear suspension should improve control and comfort off-road.
Hydraulic disc brakes should help with control on loose or uneven terrain.
Torque is strong compared with similar e-bikes, which should help on loose or uneven climbs.
The 29-inch wheel size should help rollover and stability on rougher terrain.
92
Excellent hill climbing support
Torque is above average for this type of e-bike.
Torque is above average for this type of e-bike.
Power-to-weight is above average.
Motor power is high compared with similar e-bikes.
The torque-sensing assistance should help the bike respond more naturally on climbs.
The bike has 10 or more gears, which should help on varied climbs.
The calculated power-to-weight score is 24.96.
92
Excellent technical trail control
The mountain bike design is well suited to technical trail control.
The mountain bike design is well suited to technical trail control.
Front and rear suspension should significantly improve control on technical trails.
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide the control needed for technical trail riding.
The 29-inch wheel size should help rollover and stability on technical terrain.
Torque is above average for this type of e-bike.
Torque-sensing assistance should help with smoother control on technical sections.
Power-to-weight is strong, which should help with technical sections that need quick support.
89
Excellent trail control
The mountain bike format should feel well suited to trail riding.
The mountain bike format should feel well suited to trail riding.
Front and rear suspension should improve control on uneven trails.
Hydraulic disc brakes should improve control on loose or uneven trails.
The 29-inch wheel size should help rollover and stability on trails.
Torque is strong compared with similar e-bikes, which should help low-speed trail control.
Torque-sensing assistance should help with smoother power control on trails.
Power-to-weight is strong, which should help when controlling the bike over uneven trail sections.
83
Good rough-road comfort
Front and rear suspension should significantly improve comfort on rough roads and uneven surfaces.
Front and rear suspension should significantly improve comfort on rough roads and uneven surfaces.
The larger wheel size should help roll over bumps and rough surfaces more smoothly.
The mountain bike format is generally better suited to rougher terrain.
Hydraulic disc brakes add useful control on rougher routes.
The bike weight may help it feel more planted over rough surfaces.
Frame material is listed as carbon fiber, which gives useful comfort and build context.
76
Good braking confidence
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide strong and controlled stopping power.
74
Good power-to-weight ratio
Power-to-weight is above average for this type of e-bike.
Power-to-weight is above average for this type of e-bike.
Motor power is high for this type of e-bike.
The calculated power-to-weight score is 24.96.
71
Good acceleration support
Motor power is high compared with similar e-bikes.
Motor power is high compared with similar e-bikes.
Torque is above average for this type of e-bike.
Power-to-weight is above average.
Torque-sensing assistance should make the motor response feel more natural.
The calculated power-to-weight score is 24.96.
70
Good battery capacity
Battery capacity is above average for this type of e-bike.
Battery capacity is above average for this type of e-bike.
The listed battery capacity is large in absolute terms.
Overview
The Orbea WILD M20 2024 is a mountain bike built for tackling rough terrain with confidence, offering strong motor support and responsive handling on trails. Its 600W motor with 85Nm of torque provides excellent hill climbing power, while front and rear suspension ensures a comfortable ride over uneven surfaces. Hydraulic disc brakes offer reliable stopping power, though the bike's battery efficiency is lower than average, limiting range for longer rides. Charging takes around six hours, which is slower than many similar models, and the non-removable battery means you'll need to keep the whole bike near a power source to recharge.
Best For
✓
This mountain e-bike should suit riders who prioritize off-road performance, trail control and hill climbing support. Its strong motor power, high torque and suspension system make it well-suited for challenging terrain and rough surfaces. Riders who need a reliable e-bike for extended trail rides or who value confident braking and responsive assistance will likely appreciate its capabilities. Its above-average battery capacity also makes it a good choice for longer rides without frequent recharging.
Who Should Avoid It
×
Riders planning long off-road adventures may want to compare alternatives, as the range is lower than average for similar mountain e-bikes, which could limit extended rides. The charging time is also slower compared to rivals, which might be a drawback for those needing quick turnaround between rides. However, the bike still offers strong hill climbing support and excellent trail control, making it a solid choice for riders prioritizing performance on technical terrain over extended range or fast charging.
Ownership considerations
These points highlight practical ownership factors such as maintenance, storage, charging, everyday
handling and bad-weather usability.
16
More maintenance likely
Poor
Chain drive is common and serviceable, but needs more cleaning and lubrication than a belt drive.
Chain drive is common and serviceable, but needs more cleaning and lubrication than a belt drive.
Hydraulic disc brakes are a strong everyday setup, though they may need occasional specialist servicing.
Tyres are listed, but there is no clear puncture-protection signal.
The carbon frame material can be lightweight, though damage checks may need more care.
The mountain bike format may involve more wear from rougher riding and more complex components.
A higher number of gears can add drivetrain complexity.
Front and rear suspension can add maintenance complexity.
0
Limited storage practicality
Poor
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
A full-suspension mountain bike format is usually bulkier and harder to store indoors.
21
Harder to lift
Poor
The bike weight is average for this type of e-bike.
The bike weight is average for this type of e-bike.
The listed weight is 24.04 kg.
The carbon frame material should help keep weight down.
The mountain bike format can be bulkier and harder to lift than simpler urban e-bikes.
The 29-inch wheel size can make the bike more awkward to lift or store.
17
No removable battery advantage
Poor
The battery does not appear to be removable, so the whole bike may need to be near a charging point.
The battery does not appear to be removable, so the whole bike may need to be near a charging point.
This bike type can be larger or heavier, so a removable battery adds useful charging flexibility.
The larger battery capacity makes removable charging more useful for day-to-day convenience.
The longer charging time makes it more useful to charge the battery separately from the bike.
0
Very slow charging speed
Poor
Charging time is longer than average for this type of e-bike.
Charging time is longer than average for this type of e-bike.
The quoted charging time is long in absolute terms.
0
Low battery efficiency
Poor
The bike appears to get less range from its battery size than many similar e-bikes.
The bike appears to get less range from its battery size than many similar e-bikes.
The calculated range per battery unit is 53.33.
Range is weak despite a larger battery, which suggests lower battery efficiency.
40
Some everyday equipment gaps
Weak
The included display or control unit adds useful ride information for daily use.
The included display or control unit adds useful ride information for daily use.
Hydraulic disc brakes are useful equipment for confident daily riding.
Payload capacity is average or better, which helps with bags, shopping or daily kit.
53
Mixed bad-weather practicality
Mixed
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide better control and confidence in wet conditions.
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide better control and confidence in wet conditions.
Built-in lights are not listed, so bad-weather visibility may depend on extra accessories.
The mountain bike format should offer useful control on rough or slippery surfaces.
Suspension can help control and comfort on rough, wet or uneven surfaces.
The bike weight may help it feel more planted in wet or windy conditions.
The wheel size should be workable for regular poor-weather riding, depending on tyre choice.
Frame material is listed as carbon fiber, which gives useful durability and maintenance context.
42
Some family utility limitations
Weak
Payload capacity is above average for this type of e-bike.
Payload capacity is above average for this type of e-bike.
The listed maximum payload should be useful for family or utility riding.
The listed maximum payload is 150 kg.
Hydraulic disc brakes are useful when carrying children, shopping or heavier loads.
Battery capacity is strong compared with similar e-bikes, supporting utility trips.
80W more power28 miles more range9 Ah more battery0 kg lighterSame gears
Potential limitations
Areas where this e-bike may be less strong based on its specs and comparisons.
0
Limited commuting practicality
The mountain bike format is less commuting-focused and may be less efficient for daily urban use.
The mountain bike format is less commuting-focused and may be less efficient for daily urban use.
Range is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit commuting flexibility.
Charging time is longer than average, which may be less convenient for daily use.
Built-in lights are not listed, so commuting equipment may need adding.
A non-removable battery can make charging less flexible.
The display or control unit should make it easier to monitor assist level and battery use.
Hydraulic disc brakes are a strong practical feature for daily riding.
Payload capacity is strong compared with similar e-bikes, which helps with bags, shopping or extra kit.
Front and rear suspension can add weight and complexity for normal commuting.
0
Limited storage practicality
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
A full-suspension mountain bike format is usually bulkier and harder to store indoors.
0
Very slow charging speed
Charging time is longer than average for this type of e-bike.
Charging time is longer than average for this type of e-bike.
The quoted charging time is long in absolute terms.
0
Low battery efficiency
The bike appears to get less range from its battery size than many similar e-bikes.
The bike appears to get less range from its battery size than many similar e-bikes.
The calculated range per battery unit is 53.33.
Range is weak despite a larger battery, which suggests lower battery efficiency.
11
No built-in light advantage
Built-in lights are not listed, so separate lights may be needed.
Built-in lights are not listed, so separate lights may be needed.
The display or control unit may make light and ride-status management easier.
Battery capacity is average or better for this type of e-bike, supporting everyday powered accessories.
16
More maintenance likely
Chain drive is common and serviceable, but needs more cleaning and lubrication than a belt drive.
Chain drive is common and serviceable, but needs more cleaning and lubrication than a belt drive.
Hydraulic disc brakes are a strong everyday setup, though they may need occasional specialist servicing.
Tyres are listed, but there is no clear puncture-protection signal.
The carbon frame material can be lightweight, though damage checks may need more care.
The mountain bike format may involve more wear from rougher riding and more complex components.
A higher number of gears can add drivetrain complexity.
Front and rear suspension can add maintenance complexity.
17
No removable battery advantage
The battery does not appear to be removable, so the whole bike may need to be near a charging point.
The battery does not appear to be removable, so the whole bike may need to be near a charging point.
This bike type can be larger or heavier, so a removable battery adds useful charging flexibility.
The larger battery capacity makes removable charging more useful for day-to-day convenience.
The longer charging time makes it more useful to charge the battery separately from the bike.
19
Limited longer-ride suitability
Range is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit longer rides.
Range is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit longer rides.
Battery capacity is strong compared with similar e-bikes.
Battery efficiency appears weak, which may reduce real-world long-ride usefulness.
The battery does not appear to be removable, which can make charging less flexible on longer days.
Charging time is longer than average, which may be less convenient for back-to-back longer rides.
The display or control unit should make it easier to monitor assistance and battery use on longer rides.
E-system & battery comparison
Motor Power
600 watts
▲ 160 W above average
Motor Torque
85 Nm
▲ 6.5 Nm above average
Power-to-weight
24.96 W/kg
▲ 4.6 W/kg above average
Battery Capacity
750 Wh
▲ 119 Wh above average
Claimed Max Range
40 miles
▼ 21 miles below average
Charge Time
6h
▲ 45 mins slower than average
Sensor Type
Torque and Cadence Sensor
Removable Battery
No
Motor Name
Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 4
This mountain e-bike offers a strong motor output that should feel lively and responsive on trails, with good support for climbing and low-speed technical riding. Next to similar models, its motor should deliver a balance of power and control that feels natural, with torque sensing helping to keep assistance predictable. The motor should provide solid climbing support and help push through rough terrain, though riders may notice the battery doesn't last as long as on some similar e-bikes. The torque and cadence sensor setup should allow for smooth, adjustable assistance that works well with the bike's suspension and trail-focused design. Riders looking for a capable motor that feels balanced on technical trails should find this setup suitable, though those prioritizing longer rides may want to consider battery efficiency.
This explanation is based on the bike’s motor power, torque, battery capacity, claimed range, charging
time, sensor type and how those figures compare with similar e-bikes in our database.
eBike FAQs
Is this bike suitable for long off-road rides?
This mountain bike is well-suited for off-road trails, with strong motor support and responsive handling that should help you tackle rough terrain confidently. The front and rear suspension should improve comfort on uneven surfaces, and the hydraulic disc brakes should provide reliable stopping power. However, the battery efficiency is lower than average, which may limit your range on longer rides, so you might need to plan for more frequent charging stops.
How does the motor perform when climbing steep trails?
The motor should handle steep trails well, thanks to its above-average torque and power-to-weight ratio, which help with climbing. However, the bike's battery efficiency is lower than average, so you may need to plan for more frequent charging on long or steep climbs. The torque and cadence sensor should provide reasonably smooth power delivery, though it may not be perfectly seamless in all conditions.
Does the bike offer good comfort on rough and uneven terrain?
The Orbea WILD M20 2024 should offer good comfort on rough and uneven terrain, thanks to its front and rear suspension system, which is designed to absorb shocks and improve ride quality over rough surfaces. The 29-inch wheels and Maxxis Minion DHR II tires also contribute to stability and grip on uneven trails. While it's optimized for off-road performance, its comfort on rough terrain is likely above average for similar mountain e-bikes.
Is the battery efficient enough for regular trail use?
The battery efficiency for regular trail use is somewhat limited, as the range of 40 miles is below average for similar mountain e-bikes. This means you may need to plan for more frequent charging, especially on longer or more demanding trails. The battery capacity of 750 watt-hours is competitive, but the bike doesn't get as much range from it as many similar models, which could be a consideration for extended rides.
How long does it take to charge the battery, and is that a drawback?
The battery takes around 6 hours to fully charge, which is about average for similar mountain e-bikes. However, this charging time could be a drawback if you need to recharge quickly after a ride, especially since the battery isn't removable, meaning you'll need to leave the whole bike near a power source. This might be less convenient for riders who frequently travel to remote trails or need to recharge on the go.
Who would this bike be best suited for?
This bike is best suited for experienced off-road riders who prioritize hill climbing and trail control over long-distance range. The powerful motor and strong torque make it ideal for challenging trails, while the front and rear suspension provide comfort on rough terrain. However, the limited range and non-removable battery may be drawbacks for those needing extended rides or convenient charging options.
Is this bike good value for its price compared to similar models?
This bike offers strong performance for off-road use, with a powerful motor and good suspension, but its price is higher than many similar e-bikes, which may make it less appealing for some buyers. The battery efficiency is below average, meaning you might need to charge it more frequently on longer rides. However, the overall build quality and trail control make it a solid choice for serious mountain e-bike enthusiasts who prioritize performance over cost.
What are the main compromises or trade-offs of this bike?
The main compromises of this bike include a slower charging time compared to similar e-bikes, which may be inconvenient if you need to recharge frequently. It also lacks a foldable frame, which limits storage options, especially if you need to transport it easily. Additionally, the chain drive system, while reliable, requires more maintenance and cleaning than alternatives like belt drives.
eBike Overview
eBike Type: Mountain Bike
The style of riding intended for this bike
Released:
2024
The bike was released 2 years ago
Screen
Bosch 600 W
Lights Included
No
Weight (inc battery): 24.04 kg
The website average for electric bikes is
22.92 kg.
This electric bike is 1.11 kg over the average. Total bike weight may vary depending on frame size.
Sizing & Geometry
Min / Max Rider Height
SM, MD, LG, XL available
Folded Dimensions
Unknown
Wheel & Tire Details
Wheelset Name
Race Face AR 30 c Tubeless Ready rims laced to Shimano hubs
