Highlights based on this e-bike’s specs, comparisons and practical strengths.
86
Excellent downhill control
Front and rear suspension should improve control and confidence on descents.
Front and rear suspension should improve control and confidence on descents.
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide controlled braking on descents.
The mountain bike design should be better suited to controlled descending.
83
Good rough-road comfort
Front and rear suspension should significantly improve comfort on rough roads and uneven surfaces.
Front and rear suspension should significantly improve comfort on rough roads and uneven surfaces.
The larger wheel size should help roll over bumps and rough surfaces more smoothly.
The mountain bike format is generally better suited to rougher terrain.
Hydraulic disc brakes add useful control on rougher routes.
The bike weight may help it feel more planted over rough surfaces.
Frame material is listed as aluminium, which gives useful comfort and build context.
79
Good off-road capability
The mountain bike design should be well suited to off-road riding.
The mountain bike design should be well suited to off-road riding.
Front and rear suspension should improve control and comfort off-road.
Hydraulic disc brakes should help with control on loose or uneven terrain.
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit off-road climbing support.
The 27.5-inch wheel size is a strong option for off-road control and manoeuvrability.
76
Good braking confidence
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide strong and controlled stopping power.
69
Mixed technical trail control
The mountain bike design is well suited to technical trail control.
The mountain bike design is well suited to technical trail control.
Front and rear suspension should significantly improve control on technical trails.
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide the control needed for technical trail riding.
The 27.5-inch wheel size should help balance control and manoeuvrability.
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit technical climbing and control.
Torque-sensing assistance should help with smoother control on technical sections.
The bike is heavier than average for its type, which may affect technical handling.
68
Mixed trail control
The mountain bike format should feel well suited to trail riding.
The mountain bike format should feel well suited to trail riding.
Front and rear suspension should improve control on uneven trails.
Hydraulic disc brakes should improve control on loose or uneven trails.
The 27.5-inch wheel size should balance manoeuvrability and trail control.
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit control on steeper or looser trail sections.
Torque-sensing assistance should help with smoother power control on trails.
62
Mixed stable ride feel
The mountain bike format should feel stable on uneven or rougher routes.
The mountain bike format should feel stable on uneven or rougher routes.
The bike weight should help it feel more planted and settled on the road.
The larger wheel size should support a more stable and settled ride feel.
Hydraulic disc brakes should add confidence and control to the overall ride feel.
Suspension should help the bike feel more settled over uneven surfaces.
Frame material is listed as aluminium, which gives useful build and ride-feel context.
59
Decent rider controls
The included display or control unit should give useful ride information and control.
The included display or control unit should give useful ride information and control.
Torque and cadence sensing should improve how precisely the bike responds to rider input.
55
Mixed power delivery feel
Torque and cadence sensing should help the motor deliver more natural and controlled assistance.
Torque and cadence sensing should help the motor deliver more natural and controlled assistance.
Ride modes are not listed, so assist adjustability is unclear.
The included display or control unit should make it easier to manage assistance levels.
53
Mixed bad-weather practicality
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide better control and confidence in wet conditions.
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide better control and confidence in wet conditions.
Built-in lights are not listed, so bad-weather visibility may depend on extra accessories.
The mountain bike format should offer useful control on rough or slippery surfaces.
Suspension can help control and comfort on rough, wet or uneven surfaces.
The bike weight may help it feel more planted in wet or windy conditions.
The wheel size should be workable for regular poor-weather riding, depending on tyre choice.
Frame material is listed as aluminium, which gives useful durability and maintenance context.
Overview
The Focus SAM² 6.7 2020 is a mountain bike designed for trail riding and rough terrain, offering a smooth and comfortable experience on uneven surfaces thanks to its front and rear suspension. With a 250W motor and 70Nm of torque, it provides controlled assistance that's adequate for moderate climbs but may struggle on steep inclines. The bike's 31km range and 378Wh battery are sufficient for short to medium rides, though longer trips may require careful planning. Hydraulic disc brakes ensure confident stopping power, and the aluminium frame keeps the bike durable, though its 24.7kg weight makes it less convenient to lift or carry. This is a solid choice for trail enthusiasts who prioritize comfort and off-road capability over extended range or high-speed performance.
Best For
✓
This mountain e-bike should suit riders who enjoy trail riding and want a balance of comfort and control on rougher terrain. Its front and rear suspension, combined with hydraulic disc brakes, makes it a solid choice for riders prioritising stability and confidence on uneven surfaces. The torque and cadence sensor ensures assistance feels natural and responsive to effort, which is likely to appeal to those seeking a more intuitive riding experience. Riders who value a well-rounded mountain e-bike with good off-road capability and braking performance will find this model a strong contender in its category.
Who Should Avoid It
×
Riders who prioritize long-distance off-road rides or need strong hill-climbing support may want to compare alternatives. The bike's battery capacity and motor power are below average for mountain e-bikes, which could limit range and acceleration on challenging terrain. Riders carrying heavier loads or needing a more powerful motor for steep climbs might find stronger options in similar models. However, the bike still offers good braking confidence and off-road capability for riders focused on trail performance and comfort.
Ownership considerations
These points highlight practical ownership factors such as maintenance, storage, charging, everyday
handling and bad-weather usability.
19
More maintenance likely
Poor
Chain drive is common and serviceable, but needs more cleaning and lubrication than a belt drive.
Chain drive is common and serviceable, but needs more cleaning and lubrication than a belt drive.
Hydraulic disc brakes are a strong everyday setup, though they may need occasional specialist servicing.
Tyres are listed, but there is no clear puncture-protection signal.
The aluminium frame material is practical for everyday use and general maintenance.
The mountain bike format may involve more wear from rougher riding and more complex components.
A higher number of gears can add drivetrain complexity.
Front and rear suspension can add maintenance complexity.
0
Limited storage practicality
Poor
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The bike is heavier than average for its type, which may make storage and moving it harder.
A full-suspension mountain bike format is usually bulkier and harder to store indoors.
12
Harder to lift
Poor
The bike is heavier than average for its type, so it may not be especially easy to lift.
The bike is heavier than average for its type, so it may not be especially easy to lift.
The listed weight is 24.7 kg.
The aluminium frame material is a practical lightweight choice for many e-bikes.
The mountain bike format can be bulkier and harder to lift than simpler urban e-bikes.
14
No removable battery advantage
Poor
The battery does not appear to be removable, so the whole bike may need to be near a charging point.
The battery does not appear to be removable, so the whole bike may need to be near a charging point.
This bike type can be larger or heavier, so a removable battery adds useful charging flexibility.
Because the bike is heavier than average, removing the battery can make handling and charging more convenient.
51
Average charging speed
Mixed
Charging time is shorter than average for this type of e-bike.
Charging time is shorter than average for this type of e-bike.
The quoted charging time is long in absolute terms.
29
Low battery efficiency
Poor
Battery efficiency appears average for this type of e-bike.
Battery efficiency appears average for this type of e-bike.
The calculated range per battery unit is 82.01.
32
Some everyday equipment gaps
Weak
The included display or control unit adds useful ride information for daily use.
The included display or control unit adds useful ride information for daily use.
Hydraulic disc brakes are useful equipment for confident daily riding.
53
Mixed bad-weather practicality
Mixed
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide better control and confidence in wet conditions.
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide better control and confidence in wet conditions.
Built-in lights are not listed, so bad-weather visibility may depend on extra accessories.
The mountain bike format should offer useful control on rough or slippery surfaces.
Suspension can help control and comfort on rough, wet or uneven surfaces.
The bike weight may help it feel more planted in wet or windy conditions.
The wheel size should be workable for regular poor-weather riding, depending on tyre choice.
Frame material is listed as aluminium, which gives useful durability and maintenance context.
14
Limited family utility practicality
Poor
The listed maximum payload is practical for lighter utility use.
The listed maximum payload is practical for lighter utility use.
The listed maximum payload is 120 kg.
Hydraulic disc brakes are useful when carrying children, shopping or heavier loads.
350W more power44 miles more range7 Ah more battery0 kg heavierSame gears
Potential limitations
Areas where this e-bike may be less strong based on its specs and comparisons.
0
Limited motor punch
Motor power is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Motor power is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Torque is below average for this type of e-bike.
Power-to-weight is low.
Torque-sensing assistance should make the motor response feel more natural.
The bike is heavier than average for its type.
The calculated power-to-weight score is 10.12.
0
Not ideal for steep hills
Torque is below average for this type of e-bike.
Torque is below average for this type of e-bike.
Power-to-weight is low.
Motor power is low compared with similar e-bikes.
The torque-sensing assistance should help the bike respond more naturally on climbs.
The bike has 10 or more gears, which should help on varied climbs.
The bike is heavier than average for its type.
The calculated power-to-weight score is 10.12.
0
Limited commuting practicality
The mountain bike format is less commuting-focused and may be less efficient for daily urban use.
The mountain bike format is less commuting-focused and may be less efficient for daily urban use.
Range is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit commuting flexibility.
Charging time is average or better, which is useful for regular commuting.
Built-in lights are not listed, so commuting equipment may need adding.
A non-removable battery can make charging less flexible.
The display or control unit should make it easier to monitor assist level and battery use.
Hydraulic disc brakes are a strong practical feature for daily riding.
The bike is heavier than average for its type, which may make daily handling less convenient.
Front and rear suspension can add weight and complexity for normal commuting.
0
Low power-to-weight ratio
Power-to-weight is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Power-to-weight is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Motor power is low compared with similar e-bikes.
The bike is heavier than average for its type.
The calculated power-to-weight score is 10.12.
0
Limited storage practicality
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The bike is heavier than average for its type, which may make storage and moving it harder.
A full-suspension mountain bike format is usually bulkier and harder to store indoors.
5
Low battery capacity
Battery capacity is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Battery capacity is low compared with similar e-bikes.
The listed battery capacity is modest but still usable for shorter rides.
5
No built-in light advantage
Built-in lights are not listed, so separate lights may be needed.
Built-in lights are not listed, so separate lights may be needed.
The display or control unit may make light and ride-status management easier.
7
Limited longer-ride suitability
Range is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit longer rides.
Range is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit longer rides.
Battery capacity is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Battery efficiency appears broadly average.
The battery does not appear to be removable, which can make charging less flexible on longer days.
Charging time is shorter than average, which can help if topping up between rides.
The display or control unit should make it easier to monitor assistance and battery use on longer rides.
E-system & battery comparison
Motor Power
250 watts
▼ 190 W below average
Motor Torque
70 Nm
▼ 8.5 Nm below average
Power-to-weight
10.12 W/kg
▼ 10 W/kg below average
Battery Capacity
378 Wh
▼ 253 Wh below average
Claimed Max Range
31 miles
▼ 30 miles below average
Charge Time
4h 54m
▼ 21 mins faster than average
Sensor Type
Torque and Cadence Sensor
Removable Battery
No
Motor Name
Shimano STEPS E 8000
This mountain e-bike offers legal-style pedal assist with a focus on natural response and predictable support, making it feel balanced for trail riding. Next to similar e-bikes, it may feel a bit more modest in outright power and low-speed punch, especially when tackling steeper climbs or needing extra push. The motor should provide reasonable climbing support, though riders may need to put in more effort on very steep terrain compared to some alternatives. With torque and cadence sensing, the assistance should feel responsive and well-controlled, helping maintain a natural riding feel on varied trails. Riders looking for a lightweight trail e-bike that prioritizes balance and trail confidence over maximum motor punch may find this setup suits their needs.
This explanation is based on the bike’s motor power, torque, battery capacity, claimed range, charging
time, sensor type and how those figures compare with similar e-bikes in our database.
eBike FAQs
Is this bike suitable for long off-road rides?
This mountain bike is well-suited for off-road trails and rough terrain, thanks to its suspension system and hydraulic disc brakes, which provide confident stopping power on uneven surfaces. However, its 31-mile range and lower battery capacity may limit how far you can ride on a single charge, especially on longer or more demanding routes. The bike’s weight and motor power also mean it may struggle with steep climbs or high-speed trail riding, making it more ideal for moderate off-road adventures rather than extended or intense trail sessions.
How does the motor perform when climbing steep trails?
The motor provides smooth support for moderate climbs but may struggle on very steep trails. With 250W of power and 70Nm of torque, it's below average for mountain e-bikes, which means you might need to pedal harder on steep inclines. The torque and cadence sensor helps maintain consistent assistance, but riders looking for strong hill-climbing performance may find this bike less capable compared to more powerful models.
Does the bike handle rough terrain comfortably?
The Focus SAM² 6.7 2020 should handle rough terrain comfortably, thanks to its front and rear suspension, which is designed to absorb shocks and improve ride comfort on uneven surfaces. Hydraulic disc brakes provide confident stopping power, which is essential for maintaining control on rough trails. While it's built for off-road use, its mountain bike format may not be as practical for daily urban commuting.
Is the battery capacity sufficient for regular off-road use?
The battery capacity of 378 watt-hours is below average for similar mountain e-bikes, which may limit range during extended off-road rides. While the bike is designed for off-road use and offers good comfort on rough terrain, the lower battery capacity could require more frequent charging, especially on longer or more demanding trails. The non-removable battery also means you'll need to charge the bike near a power source, which may be less convenient for multi-day off-road trips.
How does the bike's weight affect its portability and handling?
The bike's weight can influence how easily it is handled, especially when maneuvering on rough terrain or lifting it for storage. While the weight isn't explicitly listed, the power-to-weight ratio is below average for similar e-bikes, which may affect acceleration and climbing performance. However, the front and rear suspension should help absorb shocks, making the bike more comfortable on uneven trails despite its weight.
Is this bike good value for its price compared to similar e-bikes?
This bike offers a reasonable balance of features for its price, though it may not match the performance of more expensive models in its category. While the price is favourable compared to similar e-bikes, the motor power, torque, and battery capacity are below average, which could affect performance on challenging trails or longer rides. However, the hydraulic disc brakes and suspension system provide solid off-road capability and comfort, making it a decent option for riders prioritizing trail performance over maximum range or power.
Can the bike be easily charged without needing to move the whole unit?
The battery is not removable, so you'll need to bring the whole bike near a power source to charge it. This may be less convenient if you're away from home or need to recharge during a trip. However, the charging time is below average for similar e-bikes, which means it should recharge reasonably quickly once you're near a plug.
What are the main limitations of this e-bike for serious mountain biking?
This e-bike is designed for mountain biking, but it has some limitations for serious off-road use. The motor power and torque are below average for similar e-bikes, which may make climbing steep trails more challenging. Additionally, the battery capacity and range are lower than average, which could limit longer rides on rough terrain. However, the hydraulic disc brakes and suspension should provide good control and comfort on most trails.
eBike Overview
eBike Type: Mountain Bike
The style of riding intended for this bike
Released:
2020
The bike was released 6 years ago
Screen
Shimano Steps E7000 LCD display
Lights Included
No
Weight (inc battery): 24.7 kg
The website average for electric bikes is
23.93 kg.
This electric bike is 0.76 kg over the average. Total bike weight may vary depending on frame size.
Sizing & Geometry
Min / Max Rider Height
S: 158–168 cm, M: 168–178 cm, L: 178–185 cm
Folded Dimensions
Unknown
Wheel & Tire Details
Wheelset Name
Race Face AR 30 Offset rims laced to Novatec hubs (Boost spacing: 110 x 15 mm front, 148 x 12 mm rear)
