Highlights based on this e-bike’s specs, comparisons and practical strengths.
100
Excellent downhill control
Front and rear suspension should improve control and confidence on descents.
Front and rear suspension should improve control and confidence on descents.
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide controlled braking on descents.
The 29-inch or mullet wheel setup should help stability and control on descents.
The mountain bike design should be better suited to controlled descending.
100
Excellent battery efficiency
The bike appears to get strong range from its battery size.
The bike appears to get strong range from its battery size.
The calculated range per battery unit is 112.5.
88
Excellent rider information and controls
The included display or control unit should give useful ride information and control.
The included display or control unit should give useful ride information and control.
Multiple ride modes should give the rider more control over assistance levels.
Torque and cadence sensing should improve how precisely the bike responds to rider input.
87
Excellent smooth power delivery
Torque and cadence sensing should help the motor deliver more natural and controlled assistance.
Torque and cadence sensing should help the motor deliver more natural and controlled assistance.
Multiple ride modes should help riders choose a smoother level of assistance.
The included display or control unit should make it easier to manage assistance levels.
81
Good off-road capability
The mountain bike design should be well suited to off-road riding.
The mountain bike design should be well suited to off-road riding.
Front and rear suspension should improve control and comfort off-road.
Hydraulic disc brakes should help with control on loose or uneven terrain.
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit off-road climbing support.
The 29-inch wheel size should help rollover and stability on rougher terrain.
77
Good technical trail control
The mountain bike design is well suited to technical trail control.
The mountain bike design is well suited to technical trail control.
Front and rear suspension should significantly improve control on technical trails.
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide the control needed for technical trail riding.
The 29-inch wheel size should help rollover and stability on technical terrain.
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit technical climbing and control.
Torque-sensing assistance should help with smoother control on technical sections.
Multiple ride modes should help the rider manage assistance on technical trails.
76
Good braking confidence
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide strong and controlled stopping power.
76
Good rough-road comfort
Front and rear suspension should significantly improve comfort on rough roads and uneven surfaces.
Front and rear suspension should significantly improve comfort on rough roads and uneven surfaces.
The larger wheel size should help roll over bumps and rough surfaces more smoothly.
The mountain bike format is generally better suited to rougher terrain.
Hydraulic disc brakes add useful control on rougher routes.
Frame material is listed as carbon fiber, which gives useful comfort and build context.
70
Good trail control
The mountain bike format should feel well suited to trail riding.
The mountain bike format should feel well suited to trail riding.
Front and rear suspension should improve control on uneven trails.
Hydraulic disc brakes should improve control on loose or uneven trails.
The 29-inch wheel size should help rollover and stability on trails.
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit control on steeper or looser trail sections.
Torque-sensing assistance should help with smoother power control on trails.
53
Mixed range-to-weight balance
The bike is lighter than average for its type.
The bike is lighter than average for its type.
Battery efficiency appears strong, which supports a better range-to-weight balance.
The calculated range per kg is 2.24.
The calculated range per battery unit is 112.5.
Overview
The CUBE AMS HYBRID ONE44 C:68X SLX 400X is a mountain bike designed for trail riding and rough terrain, offering a smooth and controlled motor assistance that feels natural with its torque and cadence sensors. Its front and rear suspension provide good comfort on uneven surfaces, while hydraulic disc brakes give confident stopping power. However, the bike's motor power and torque are on the lower side, which may make steep climbs and quick acceleration feel less responsive. The battery, while efficient for its size, has a limited capacity and takes a long time to charge, which could be a consideration for longer rides or frequent use.
Best For
✓
This mountain e-bike should suit riders who enjoy trail riding and want a balance of comfort and control on rougher terrain. Its smooth power delivery and responsive assistance make it a good fit for riders who value natural effort-to-power feedback, while the front and rear suspension should help keep things comfortable on uneven surfaces. The hydraulic disc brakes also provide confidence when stopping, which is especially useful on technical trails.
Who Should Avoid It
×
Riders seeking stronger hill-climbing performance or longer range may want to compare alternatives, as this bike has lower torque and battery capacity compared to similar mountain e-bikes. Riders who need faster charging or more aggressive trail performance could find stronger options in the same category. However, the bike still offers smooth power delivery and good off-road comfort for riders prioritizing natural assistance and controlled riding on varied terrain.
Ownership considerations
These points highlight practical ownership factors such as maintenance, storage, charging, everyday
handling and bad-weather usability.
16
More maintenance likely
Poor
Chain drive is common and serviceable, but needs more cleaning and lubrication than a belt drive.
Chain drive is common and serviceable, but needs more cleaning and lubrication than a belt drive.
Hydraulic disc brakes are a strong everyday setup, though they may need occasional specialist servicing.
Tyres are listed, but there is no clear puncture-protection signal.
The carbon frame material can be lightweight, though damage checks may need more care.
The mountain bike format may involve more wear from rougher riding and more complex components.
A higher number of gears can add drivetrain complexity.
Front and rear suspension can add maintenance complexity.
0
Limited storage practicality
Poor
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The bike is lighter than many similar e-bikes, which should make storage and moving it around easier.
A full-suspension mountain bike format is usually bulkier and harder to store indoors.
39
Some lifting limitations
Weak
The bike is lighter than average for its type, which should help day-to-day handling.
The bike is lighter than average for its type, which should help day-to-day handling.
The listed weight is 20.1 kg.
The carbon frame material should help keep weight down.
The mountain bike format can be bulkier and harder to lift than simpler urban e-bikes.
The 29-inch wheel size can make the bike more awkward to lift or store.
11
No removable battery advantage
Poor
The battery does not appear to be removable, so the whole bike may need to be near a charging point.
The battery does not appear to be removable, so the whole bike may need to be near a charging point.
This bike type can be larger or heavier, so a removable battery adds useful charging flexibility.
The longer charging time makes it more useful to charge the battery separately from the bike.
0
Very slow charging speed
Poor
Charging time is high compared with similar e-bikes.
Charging time is high compared with similar e-bikes.
The quoted charging time is long in absolute terms.
100
Excellent battery efficiency
Excellent
The bike appears to get strong range from its battery size.
The bike appears to get strong range from its battery size.
The calculated range per battery unit is 112.5.
44
Some everyday equipment gaps
Weak
The included display or control unit adds useful ride information for daily use.
The included display or control unit adds useful ride information for daily use.
Multiple ride modes should help adapt the bike to different everyday journeys.
Hydraulic disc brakes are useful equipment for confident daily riding.
48
Some bad-weather limitations
Weak
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide better control and confidence in wet conditions.
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide better control and confidence in wet conditions.
Built-in lights are not listed, so bad-weather visibility may depend on extra accessories.
The mountain bike format should offer useful control on rough or slippery surfaces.
Suspension can help control and comfort on rough, wet or uneven surfaces.
The wheel size should be workable for regular poor-weather riding, depending on tyre choice.
Frame material is listed as carbon fiber, which gives useful durability and maintenance context.
14
Limited family utility practicality
Poor
The listed maximum payload is practical for lighter utility use.
The listed maximum payload is practical for lighter utility use.
The listed maximum payload is 120 kg.
Hydraulic disc brakes are useful when carrying children, shopping or heavier loads.
Where to buy
Priced at £5,499, this e-bike is broadly in line with similar 2025 mountain e-bikes, offering solid suspension and hydraulic braking for trail comfort and control. While it may feel more expensive compared to older models or alternatives with different priorities, it provides a responsive ride for off-road use, though some competitors may offer greater range or stronger climbing support.
Compared with similar mountain bike e-bikes on Bikkerr, this model sits £136.01 above average
Best price ever seen:
£5,499.00Prices update every ~24 hours
Priced at £5,499, this e-bike sits in line with similar mountain e-bikes from 2025, though it may feel more expensive when compared to older models or alternatives with different priorities. It offers solid suspension, hydraulic braking, and torque-sensing assistance that should make it feel responsive and comfortable on rougher trails, which are key considerations for off-road riding. However, some similar e-bikes may offer greater range or larger batteries, and others might provide stronger climbing support or a more lively ride for its weight. For a mountain e-bike focused on trail comfort and control, the value case is clearer, especially if the rider prioritises suspension and braking over maximum range or battery size. Riders looking for a well-rounded trail e-bike with good stopping power and smooth assistance may find the price more justifiable, while those needing extended range or stronger hill support might find more options elsewhere.
We reach this value score by combining the bike’s price, specification, performance data and comparison against similar e-bikes in our database.
350W more power8 miles more range11 Ah more battery3 kg heavierSame gears
Potential limitations
Areas where this e-bike may be less strong based on its specs and comparisons.
0
Limited motor punch
Motor power is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Motor power is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Power-to-weight is low.
Torque-sensing assistance should make the motor response feel more natural.
The bike is lighter than many similar e-bikes, which should help responsiveness.
The calculated power-to-weight score is 12.44.
0
Not ideal for steep hills
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Power-to-weight is low.
Motor power is low compared with similar e-bikes.
The torque-sensing assistance should help the bike respond more naturally on climbs.
The bike has 10 or more gears, which should help on varied climbs.
The bike is lighter than many similar e-bikes, which should help on climbs.
The calculated power-to-weight score is 12.44.
0
Limited commuting practicality
The mountain bike format is less commuting-focused and may be less efficient for daily urban use.
The mountain bike format is less commuting-focused and may be less efficient for daily urban use.
Range is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit commuting flexibility.
Charging time is longer than average, which may be less convenient for daily use.
Built-in lights are not listed, so commuting equipment may need adding.
A non-removable battery can make charging less flexible.
The display or control unit should make it easier to monitor assist level and battery use.
Hydraulic disc brakes are a strong practical feature for daily riding.
The bike is lighter than many similar e-bikes, which helps with daily handling.
Front and rear suspension can add weight and complexity for normal commuting.
0
Low power-to-weight ratio
Power-to-weight is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Power-to-weight is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Motor power is low compared with similar e-bikes.
The bike is lighter than many similar e-bikes, which helps the power-to-weight balance.
The calculated power-to-weight score is 12.44.
0
Limited storage practicality
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The bike is lighter than many similar e-bikes, which should make storage and moving it around easier.
A full-suspension mountain bike format is usually bulkier and harder to store indoors.
0
Very slow charging speed
Charging time is high compared with similar e-bikes.
Charging time is high compared with similar e-bikes.
The quoted charging time is long in absolute terms.
5
Limited longer-ride suitability
Range is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit longer rides.
Range is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit longer rides.
Battery capacity is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Battery efficiency appears strong, which should help stretch range on longer rides.
The battery does not appear to be removable, which can make charging less flexible on longer days.
Charging time is longer than average, which may be less convenient for back-to-back longer rides.
The display or control unit should make it easier to monitor assistance and battery use on longer rides.
5
Low battery capacity
Battery capacity is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Battery capacity is low compared with similar e-bikes.
The listed battery capacity is modest but still usable for shorter rides.
E-system & battery comparison
Motor Power
250 watts
▼ 190 W below average
Motor Torque
60 Nm
▼ 18 Nm below average
Power-to-weight
12.44 W/kg
▼ 7.9 W/kg below average
Battery Capacity
400 Wh
▼ 231 Wh below average
Claimed Max Range
45 miles
▼ 16 miles below average
Charge Time
6h 30m
▲ 75 mins slower than average
Sensor Type
Torque and Cadence Sensor
Removable Battery
No
Motor Name
Bosch Performance Line SX
This mountain e-bike offers a legal-style pedal assist that feels smooth and predictable, with a focus on natural response through torque and cadence sensing. Next to similar trail-focused models, it provides more modest climbing support and less outright motor punch, which may mean steeper climbs require more rider effort. The motor should feel reasonably balanced for trail riding, with assistance that doesn't overwhelm the bike's lightweight design, though some similar e-bikes may feel livelier for their weight. The predictable assistance and efficient battery use should make it a solid choice for riders prioritizing control and trail confidence over maximum power, especially on moderate terrain.
This explanation is based on the bike’s motor power, torque, battery capacity, claimed range, charging
time, sensor type and how those figures compare with similar e-bikes in our database.
eBike FAQs
Is this bike suitable for long off-road rides?
This mountain bike is designed for trail riding and rough terrain, with front and rear suspension that should provide good comfort on uneven surfaces. However, the motor power and torque are on the lower side, which may make steep climbs and quick acceleration feel less responsive. The battery, while efficient for its size, has a limited capacity and takes a long time to charge, which could be a consideration for longer rides or frequent use.
How does the motor perform when climbing steep trails?
The motor provides smooth and controlled assistance, but its 250W power and 60Nm torque may feel less responsive when climbing steep trails. This could make steeper inclines more challenging, especially if you're carrying extra weight or riding at higher speeds. While the motor is adequate for moderate trails, riders looking for more aggressive climbs might find the power output limiting.
Does the bike offer enough range for extended mountain biking sessions?
The bike has a range of 45 miles, which should be sufficient for most mountain biking sessions, but may be limiting for very long or extended rides. The battery is efficient for its size, but its capacity is on the lower side compared to similar e-bikes, which could mean you'll need to plan for more frequent charging, especially on longer trails. If you're riding aggressively or covering a lot of ground, you may find the range falls short of your needs.
How comfortable is the bike on rough and uneven terrain?
The CUBE AMS HYBRID ONE44 C:68X SLX 400X is designed for trail riding and offers good comfort on rough and uneven terrain, thanks to its front and rear suspension. This should help absorb shocks and provide a smoother ride over rocky or uneven surfaces. However, the bike's motor power and torque are on the lower side, which may affect how responsive it feels when navigating challenging trails, but the suspension should still make the ride more comfortable overall.
Is the braking system reliable for high-speed off-road use?
The hydraulic disc brakes on this mountain bike should provide confident stopping power even at higher speeds on rough terrain. They are designed for off-road use and should handle most trail conditions effectively. However, braking performance can also depend on factors like tire grip and trail surface, so it's always a good idea to maintain proper tire pressure and brake pad condition for optimal reliability.
How does the battery efficiency compare to similar e-bikes?
The battery efficiency of this e-bike is strong for its size, offering a decent range for mountain biking, but it's on the lower end compared to similar models. With a 400 watt-hour battery, it should handle most trail rides, but the limited capacity and longer charging time may require careful planning for longer trips or frequent use.
Is this bike a good value option compared to other mountain e-bikes?
This bike offers solid features for trail riding, including good suspension, reliable braking, and smooth motor assistance. However, its lower motor power, torque, and battery capacity may limit performance on challenging terrain or longer rides. At its price point, it may not be the most competitive option compared to other mountain e-bikes with stronger motors and larger batteries, but it could still be a good choice for casual or moderate off-road use.
What are the main limitations of this bike for serious off-road riders?
This bike is designed for trail riding, but it may struggle with serious off-road challenges like steep climbs or technical terrain due to its lower motor power and torque. The battery capacity is also on the smaller side, which could limit range on longer rides. While the hydraulic disc brakes offer good stopping power, the overall performance may not match more powerful e-bikes built for intense off-road use.
eBike Overview
eBike Type: Mountain Bike
The style of riding intended for this bike
Released:
2025
The bike was released 1 years ago
Screen
Bosch System Controller with Mini Remote
Lights Included
No
Weight (inc battery): 20.1 kg
The website average for electric bikes is
23.93 kg.
This electric bike is 3.84 kg under the average. Total bike weight may vary depending on frame size.
