Highlights based on this e-bike’s specs, comparisons and practical strengths.
100
Excellent downhill control
Front and rear suspension should improve control and confidence on descents.
Front and rear suspension should improve control and confidence on descents.
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide controlled braking on descents.
The 29-inch or mullet wheel setup should help stability and control on descents.
The mountain bike design should be better suited to controlled descending.
100
Excellent battery efficiency
The bike appears to get strong range from its battery size.
The bike appears to get strong range from its battery size.
The calculated range per battery unit is 111.11.
88
Excellent rider information and controls
The included display or control unit should give useful ride information and control.
The included display or control unit should give useful ride information and control.
Multiple ride modes should give the rider more control over assistance levels.
Torque and cadence sensing should improve how precisely the bike responds to rider input.
87
Excellent smooth power delivery
Torque and cadence sensing should help the motor deliver more natural and controlled assistance.
Torque and cadence sensing should help the motor deliver more natural and controlled assistance.
Multiple ride modes should help riders choose a smoother level of assistance.
The included display or control unit should make it easier to manage assistance levels.
81
Good off-road capability
The mountain bike design should be well suited to off-road riding.
The mountain bike design should be well suited to off-road riding.
Front and rear suspension should improve control and comfort off-road.
Hydraulic disc brakes should help with control on loose or uneven terrain.
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit off-road climbing support.
The 29-inch wheel size should help rollover and stability on rougher terrain.
81
Good charging speed
Charging time is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Charging time is low compared with similar e-bikes.
The quoted charging time is long in absolute terms.
77
Good technical trail control
The mountain bike design is well suited to technical trail control.
The mountain bike design is well suited to technical trail control.
Front and rear suspension should significantly improve control on technical trails.
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide the control needed for technical trail riding.
The 29-inch wheel size should help rollover and stability on technical terrain.
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit technical climbing and control.
Torque-sensing assistance should help with smoother control on technical sections.
Multiple ride modes should help the rider manage assistance on technical trails.
76
Good braking confidence
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide strong and controlled stopping power.
70
Good trail control
The mountain bike format should feel well suited to trail riding.
The mountain bike format should feel well suited to trail riding.
Front and rear suspension should improve control on uneven trails.
Hydraulic disc brakes should improve control on loose or uneven trails.
The 29-inch wheel size should help rollover and stability on trails.
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit control on steeper or looser trail sections.
Torque-sensing assistance should help with smoother power control on trails.
67
Mixed rough-road comfort
Front and rear suspension should significantly improve comfort on rough roads and uneven surfaces.
Front and rear suspension should significantly improve comfort on rough roads and uneven surfaces.
The larger wheel size should help roll over bumps and rough surfaces more smoothly.
The mountain bike format is generally better suited to rougher terrain.
Hydraulic disc brakes add useful control on rougher routes.
A very light bike may feel less planted over rough or broken surfaces.
Frame material is listed as carbon fiber, which gives useful comfort and build context.
Overview
The Scott Contessa Lumen eRIDE 900 2024 is a mountain bike designed for trail riding, offering smooth motor support and efficient battery use that makes it well-suited for off-road adventures. With a powerful motor and torque sensor, it delivers natural assistance that feels responsive on varied terrain, though it may lack the punch needed for steep climbs. The hydraulic disc brakes provide confident stopping power, and the carbon frame keeps the bike feeling lively for its weight. However, the battery capacity is on the lower side, which limits range for longer rides, and the non-removable battery means you'll need to keep the whole bike near a charger. While it's a capable trail companion, its price point may not offer the best value compared to similar models.
Best For
✓
This mountain e-bike should suit riders who enjoy trail riding and want a balance of performance and comfort on rougher terrain. Its smooth power delivery and responsive assistance make it a natural fit for riders prioritising control and a more intuitive riding experience. The combination of front and rear suspension, along with confident braking, should appeal to those seeking stability and confidence on varied off-road surfaces. Riders who value a lighter mountain e-bike with good charging speed may also find this model particularly appealing.
Who Should Avoid It
×
Riders seeking maximum range or stronger hill-climbing performance may want to compare alternatives, as this bike has a lower battery capacity and torque compared to similar mountain e-bikes. Riders who need a removable battery for convenience may also find stronger options next to rivals. However, the bike still offers smooth power delivery and confident braking, which may suit riders prioritizing responsive assistance and control on technical trails.
Ownership considerations
These points highlight practical ownership factors such as maintenance, storage, charging, everyday
handling and bad-weather usability.
16
More maintenance likely
Poor
Chain drive is common and serviceable, but needs more cleaning and lubrication than a belt drive.
Chain drive is common and serviceable, but needs more cleaning and lubrication than a belt drive.
Hydraulic disc brakes are a strong everyday setup, though they may need occasional specialist servicing.
Tyres are listed, but there is no clear puncture-protection signal.
The carbon frame material can be lightweight, though damage checks may need more care.
The mountain bike format may involve more wear from rougher riding and more complex components.
A higher number of gears can add drivetrain complexity.
Front and rear suspension can add maintenance complexity.
0
Limited storage practicality
Poor
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The bike is lighter than many similar e-bikes, which should make storage and moving it around easier.
A full-suspension mountain bike format is usually bulkier and harder to store indoors.
59
Mixed liftability
Mixed
The bike is very light compared with similar e-bikes, which should make it easier to lift and move.
The bike is very light compared with similar e-bikes, which should make it easier to lift and move.
The listed weight is 17.6 kg.
The carbon frame material should help keep weight down.
The mountain bike format can be bulkier and harder to lift than simpler urban e-bikes.
The 29-inch wheel size can make the bike more awkward to lift or store.
6
No removable battery advantage
Poor
The battery does not appear to be removable, so the whole bike may need to be near a charging point.
The battery does not appear to be removable, so the whole bike may need to be near a charging point.
This bike type can be larger or heavier, so a removable battery adds useful charging flexibility.
81
Good charging speed
Good
Charging time is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Charging time is low compared with similar e-bikes.
The quoted charging time is long in absolute terms.
100
Excellent battery efficiency
Excellent
The bike appears to get strong range from its battery size.
The bike appears to get strong range from its battery size.
The calculated range per battery unit is 111.11.
51
Decent everyday equipment
Mixed
The included display or control unit adds useful ride information for daily use.
The included display or control unit adds useful ride information for daily use.
Multiple ride modes should help adapt the bike to different everyday journeys.
Hydraulic disc brakes are useful equipment for confident daily riding.
Payload capacity is average or better, which helps with bags, shopping or daily kit.
40
Some bad-weather limitations
Weak
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide better control and confidence in wet conditions.
Hydraulic disc brakes should provide better control and confidence in wet conditions.
Built-in lights are not listed, so bad-weather visibility may depend on extra accessories.
The mountain bike format should offer useful control on rough or slippery surfaces.
Suspension can help control and comfort on rough, wet or uneven surfaces.
A very light e-bike may feel less planted in poor weather or windy conditions.
The wheel size should be workable for regular poor-weather riding, depending on tyre choice.
Frame material is listed as carbon fiber, which gives useful durability and maintenance context.
23
Limited family utility practicality
Poor
Payload capacity is average for this type of e-bike.
Payload capacity is average for this type of e-bike.
The listed maximum payload is practical for lighter utility use.
The listed maximum payload is 128 kg.
Hydraulic disc brakes are useful when carrying children, shopping or heavier loads.
Where to buy
Priced at £6,489, the Scott Contessa Lumen eRIDE 900 2024 sits towards the higher end of the mountain e-bike market for 2024 models. Its premium positioning reflects strong component spec and performance, though buyers may want to weigh this against more affordable alternatives in the same category.
Compared with similar mountain bike e-bikes on Bikkerr, this model sits £830.93 above average
At £6,489, this Scott Contessa Lumen eRIDE 900 2024 sits at the higher end of the price spectrum when compared with similar mountain e-bikes from the same year. It offers strong points like efficient battery use, hydraulic disc brakes for confident stopping, and front and rear suspension that should help with control on rougher trails. However, some similar e-bikes may offer a larger battery, more range, or stronger motor support for climbing, which could be important for more demanding off-road use. For a mountain e-bike, the trade-off here seems to be between a lighter, more agile frame and the potential for less battery capacity or motor power. Riders who prioritise a responsive, lightweight feel on technical trails may find the value more compelling, while those needing longer range or stronger hill support might look elsewhere. The non-removable battery also adds a layer of consideration for those who need charging flexibility.
We reach this value score by combining the bike’s price, specification, performance data and comparison against similar e-bikes in our database.
35
The price/value label suggests this bike is expensive compared with similar options.
50W less powerSame range265 Wh more battery6 kg heavierSame gears
Click the tab to load better value options.
Click the tab to load closest price options.
Click the tab to load longer range options.
Click the tab to load higher power options.
Potential limitations
Areas where this e-bike may be less strong based on its specs and comparisons.
0
Limited motor punch
Motor power is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Motor power is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Power-to-weight is average for this type of e-bike.
Torque-sensing assistance should make the motor response feel more natural.
The bike is lighter than many similar e-bikes, which should help responsiveness.
The calculated power-to-weight score is 17.05.
0
Not ideal for steep hills
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Torque is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Power-to-weight is average for this type of e-bike.
Motor power is low compared with similar e-bikes.
The torque-sensing assistance should help the bike respond more naturally on climbs.
The bike has 10 or more gears, which should help on varied climbs.
The bike is lighter than many similar e-bikes, which should help on climbs.
The calculated power-to-weight score is 17.05.
0
Limited commuting practicality
The mountain bike format is less commuting-focused and may be less efficient for daily urban use.
The mountain bike format is less commuting-focused and may be less efficient for daily urban use.
Range is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit commuting flexibility.
Charging time is average or better, which is useful for regular commuting.
Built-in lights are not listed, so commuting equipment may need adding.
A non-removable battery can make charging less flexible.
The display or control unit should make it easier to monitor assist level and battery use.
Hydraulic disc brakes are a strong practical feature for daily riding.
Payload capacity is average for this type of e-bike.
The bike is lighter than many similar e-bikes, which helps with daily handling.
Front and rear suspension can add weight and complexity for normal commuting.
0
Limited storage practicality
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The frame does not appear to fold, so storage will depend more on size and weight.
The bike is lighter than many similar e-bikes, which should make storage and moving it around easier.
A full-suspension mountain bike format is usually bulkier and harder to store indoors.
5
Low battery capacity
Battery capacity is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Battery capacity is low compared with similar e-bikes.
The listed battery capacity is modest but still usable for shorter rides.
5
No built-in light advantage
Built-in lights are not listed, so separate lights may be needed.
Built-in lights are not listed, so separate lights may be needed.
The display or control unit may make light and ride-status management easier.
6
No removable battery advantage
The battery does not appear to be removable, so the whole bike may need to be near a charging point.
The battery does not appear to be removable, so the whole bike may need to be near a charging point.
This bike type can be larger or heavier, so a removable battery adds useful charging flexibility.
14
Limited longer-ride suitability
Range is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit longer rides.
Range is low compared with similar e-bikes, which may limit longer rides.
Battery capacity is low compared with similar e-bikes.
Battery efficiency appears strong, which should help stretch range on longer rides.
The battery does not appear to be removable, which can make charging less flexible on longer days.
Charging time is shorter than average, which can help if topping up between rides.
The display or control unit should make it easier to monitor assistance and battery use on longer rides.
E-system & battery comparison
Motor Power
300 watts
▼ 140 W below average
Motor Torque
50 Nm
▼ 28 Nm below average
Power-to-weight
17.05 W/kg
▼ 3.3 W/kg below average
Battery Capacity
360 Wh
▼ 271 Wh below average
Claimed Max Range
40 miles
▼ 21 miles below average
Charge Time
3h
▼ 135 mins faster than average
Sensor Type
Torque and Cadence Sensor
Removable Battery
No
Motor Name
TQ HPR 50
This mountain e-bike offers a more modest motor output for its category, with a focus on efficiency and natural assistance delivery rather than brute power. Next to similar trail e-bikes, it may feel less aggressive in acceleration and climbing support, but the torque and cadence sensor should help maintain a smooth and predictable ride. The motor should provide enough support for moderate climbs and trail riding, though steeper ascents may require more rider effort. The combination of a lightweight frame and efficient motor use should make the bike feel agile and responsive, especially on technical trails. Riders looking for a balanced, trail-focused e-bike that prioritizes control and efficiency over maximum power may find this setup well-suited to their needs.
This explanation is based on the bike’s motor power, torque, battery capacity, claimed range, charging
time, sensor type and how those figures compare with similar e-bikes in our database.
eBike FAQs
Is this bike suitable for long off-road rides?
This mountain e-bike is well-suited for off-road trails, with a design that supports trail riding and responsive motor assistance on varied terrain. However, its lower battery capacity may limit range for longer rides, and the non-removable battery means you'll need to keep the whole bike near a charger. While it offers good trail control and braking confidence, it may struggle with steep climbs due to its lower motor power and torque.
How does the motor perform when climbing steep trails?
The motor provides smooth and controlled assistance when climbing steep trails, but its performance may feel limited compared to similar e-bikes. With 300 watts of motor power and 50 Newton meters of torque, it should handle moderate inclines well, but steeper trails may require more effort. The torque and cadence sensor helps deliver natural power delivery, but the motor's lower power and torque ratings mean it may not be the best choice for very steep or technical climbs.
Does the battery provide enough range for regular mountain biking trips?
The battery provides a range of 40 miles, which is below average for similar mountain e-bikes, so it may not be sufficient for longer or more demanding off-road trips. However, the bike's battery efficiency is above average, meaning it gets good range from its 360 watt-hour capacity. If you're planning regular mountain biking trips, you may need to plan for frequent recharging, especially since the battery is not removable and the whole bike needs to be near a charging point.
How comfortable is the bike on rough terrain?
The Scott Contessa Lumen eRIDE 900 2024 should handle rough terrain reasonably well, thanks to its front and rear suspension, which should help absorb shocks and improve comfort on uneven surfaces. However, while the suspension should make rough roads more manageable, the bike's mountain bike design may not be optimized for extended rough-road comfort compared to dedicated trail or gravel bikes. The hydraulic disc brakes should also provide confident stopping power, which is important when navigating technical terrain.
Is this bike good value for its price compared to similar e-bikes?
This bike offers a good balance of performance and features for a mountain e-bike, but its price is on the higher side compared to similar models. While it has strong battery efficiency and reliable braking, its lower battery capacity and range may limit longer rides. If you prioritize off-road capability and don't need extended range, it could still be a solid choice, but buyers should consider whether the price aligns with their needs.
Can the battery be charged easily without needing to move the whole bike?
The battery on this bike is not removable, so you'll need to bring the whole bike near a charging point to recharge it. This may be less convenient if you're away from home or need to charge the battery while on the go. However, the charging time is relatively quick at 3 hours, which helps reduce downtime when you do need to recharge.
Who is this bike best suited for in terms of riding style and terrain?
This bike is best suited for riders who enjoy off-road trails and rough terrain, thanks to its front and rear suspension, hydraulic disc brakes, and mountain bike design. The 40-mile range and 3-hour charge time make it a solid choice for extended trail rides, though it may not be the most practical for daily urban commuting. Its 29-inch wheels and robust tires also contribute to its off-road capability and stability on uneven surfaces.
What are the main compromises or limitations of this bike?
This bike has a motor power and torque that are below average for similar mountain e-bikes, which may make it less responsive when accelerating or climbing steep trails. The battery capacity and range are also below average, so you may need to recharge more frequently on longer rides. While the bike offers good braking confidence and charging speed, its non-removable battery means you'll need to move the whole bike to charge it, which could be inconvenient.
eBike Overview
eBike Type: Mountain Bike
The style of riding intended for this bike
Released:
2024
The bike was released 2 years ago
Screen
TQ HPR Display
Lights Included
No
Weight (inc battery): 17.6 kg
The website average for electric bikes is
22.99 kg.
This electric bike is 5.4 kg under the average. Total bike weight may vary depending on frame size.
Sizing & Geometry
Min / Max Rider Height
SM: 158-170 cm, MD: 168-179 cm, LG: 176-187 cm
Folded Dimensions
Unknown
Wheel & Tire Details
Wheelset Name
Syncros Silverton 2.5-30 6-Bolt (F: 15 x 110 mm, R: 12 x 148 mm Boost)
Wheelset Size
29 inch
Tires
Front: Schwalbe Wicked Will 29x2.4" EVO; Super Race / TLE / 67EPI / Addix Speed Soft, Rear: Schwalbe Wicked Will 29x2.4" EVO; Super Race / TLE / 67EPI / Addix Speed Grip
